Archive for the ‘E-Cigarette Reviews’ Category

Electronic Cigarette Company Raises Industry Standards – Again

Friday, April 8th, 2011

(Tucson, AZ – April 8, 2011) – The E-Cigarette industry has recently come under fire for the [potential] sale of its product to minors. This scrutiny stems from what some say is the “misleading marketing” of candy-flavored electronic cigarettes.  Opponents of the smoke-free concept are concerned about the sale of e-cigarettes to underage consumers and the irresponsible marketing towards the non-smoking public.

Currently, online retailers are trusted to refuse sales to minors. But the question remains – how much accountability should these companies have when verifying the age of its customers – especially when the marketing is so overtly underage?

Could electronic cigarettes, which are designed to give smokers an alternative, actually create new smokers? While many in the industry who sell flavors such as watermelon, strawberry, and other fruit flavors hope the appeal brings in new customers – current smokers or not – the electronic cigarette retail giant, Green Nicotine, hopes that answer is an overwhelming no.

Sean Schoepflin, CEO of Green Nicotine said “Clearly, these flavors spark the interest of a younger generation, quite possibly, a younger generation that may have never used traditional tobacco in the first place.” Believe it or not, the only measures many E-cig companies use to verify age online, is by just asking.  He goes on to say, “By simply requiring a customer to verify their age through a drop-down menu in a shopping cart, a retailer is putting the entire onus on the customer – but Green nicotine is different.”

Starting in April, Green Nicotine will be implementing a new campaign it calls “The 21 and Older Shipment Verification Requirement.” Moving forward, the online sale of any product containing nicotine will not be delivered without a photo ID present by the receiver. This program is unique to electronic cigarette industry and will require the signature of not just someone who is 18, but rather 21, prior to the release of the package. This campaign is the first of its kind in the electronic cigarette market and is Schoepflin’s most proactive campaign to date.

Green Nicotine realizes that it’s also no secret that the illegal sale of traditional tobacco products to minors is a nation-wide epidemic. Recently, the Attorney’s General in states like Arizona and New York conducted a series of sting operations targeting retailers who fail to properly ID traditional tobacco purchases.

According to one local news report, evidence is mounting that the problem is not as isolated as simply failing to ID the purchaser – its failing to correctly verify the age.   “These days,” states an undercover agent who was a part of the sting, “many tobacco retailers use ID readers. They slide your driver’s license or ID through; it reads the strip on the back and automatically tells the clerk if you’re old enough to buy.”  This method is the only way retailers can be certain that the customer is of legal age. As the report points out, a number of retailers who were sited actually asked for identification, but still sold to the customer.

Schoepflin says, “Obviously, this negligent approach by retailers is similar to what is happening with the online sales of electronic cigarettes. There’s a clear failure on the part of the company when minors are only required to perform simple math, in order to purchase electronic cigarettes.” The campaign is the company’s way of re-affirming its commitment to the prevention of electronic cigarettes being sold to minors.

As an industry leader, Green Nicotine has never offered “fruit or candy-flavored” e-cigarettes. Schoepflin feels, “Anything that tastes like a fresh banana is sure to turn a few kids on.” His company sticks to only traditional flavors.

He believes serious smokers who are looking for an alternative are not looking for a basket of fruit. He says, “Of course I could increase sales if I offered fruit flavors, but ultimately I’d defeat the reason behind why this company came to be. Kids would pick them up, non-smokers would be intrigued…I would be hurting more than I would be helping.”

A company that is willing to sacrifice profit for the greater good? “Yes,” says Schoepflin. “I intend to eliminate any opportunity for a minor to get their hands on Green Nicotine and in turn, I look toward a future where all E-Cigarettes are ethically marketed across the industry. It’s a refreshing twist in an otherwise muddied industry.

These concerns are of great importance, my company intends on setting higher standards in an industry that is very loosely regulated.” When comparing Green Nicotine its competitors, it’s not hard to realize what makes Schoepflin’s company different. Its E-cigarettes look better, feel better, and taste better. However, that’s not what sets the company apart from others. Green Nicotine’s secret ingredient is its clear vision of changing the world one smoker at a time – without creating new ones.

For More information visit: www.GreenNicotine.com

Media Contact: Allison M. Harte
Director of Marketing, Taxon Group, LLC
520.750.1111 allison@greennicotine.com

Post to Twitter

UP in Smoke

Tuesday, April 5th, 2011

Electronic Cigarette "A Clean Alternative"

The rolling green hills and quaint farm houses paint a picturesque image…with tales of family-run tobacco farmsteads passed down from generation to generation. Dig a little deeper and what lies beneath is a trail of devastation – from debt bondage to deforestation, it’s an industry fraught with treacherous and perilous conditions.

This is not an article about the dangers of smoking; its not about how a smoker inhales more than 4000 chemical additives in each puff (some classified as toxic and not even allowed in food), nor is an expose outlining the myriad of diseases smokers die from every day. This is a saga outlining the plight of the grassroots level of the multibillion dollar tobacco industry. Forget your lungs, what about the planet?

Controversial Crop

Tobacco is one of the world’s most controversial crops. For years now, cigarette companies have experienced increasing pressure from governments, health groups, and declining public opinion. Reports stream in weekly, detailing how tobacco companies’ practices contribute to deforestation, mono-cropping, food insecurity, and pesticide contamination in developing countries, creating additional threats to Philip Morris and British American Tobacco. Using fiscal arguments, the multibillion dollar conglomerates responded; persuading governments, the media, and the general population that smoking benefits the economy. Their claim: if tobacco control measures are introduced, tax revenues will fall, jobs will be lost, and there will be great hardship to the economy.

Ok fair enough, more jobs lost in this current economic climate would prove dire, but what of the economic costs which tobacco inflicts upon every country? The production of tobacco incurs cost to governments, to employers, and to the environment; including social, welfare, and healthcare spending; loss of foreign exchange in importing cigarettes; loss of land that could grow food; costs of fires and damage to buildings caused by careless smoking; environmental costs ranging from deforestation to collection of smokers’ litter; absenteeism; decreased productivity; higher numbers of accidents, and higher insurance premiums.

Distressingly, parents send children as young as five years old to tobacco fields instead of school, preventing children from attaining an education. Tobacco companies degrade land and aggravate food insecurity through the farming of tobacco instead of less harmful export crops or food crops. Tobacco farmers and environments are vulnerable to poisoning from pesticides and fertilizers. Inflated costs for seeds and fertilizers and low tobacco prices paid by global tobacco companies contribute to farmer indebtedness to farm landlords and tobacco companies. And the list goes on.

Grown in over 125 countries across the world, on over four million hectares of land, the global tobacco crop is worth approximately USD20 billion, a small fraction of the total amount generated from the sale of manufactured tobacco products. The anomaly…the millions of tobacco farmers worldwide who should be sharing in this revenue, are in fact exploited by the tobacco industry, increasing their debt burden by binding them to watertight contracts, all the while using their economic plight to argue against efforts to control tobacco.

Electronic Cigarette "A Clean Alternative"

Slavery and Child Labor

Need another rationale to stop giving cigarette companies your hard-earned cash? Recent investigations by Human Rights Watch (HRW) found children as young as 10 picking tobacco destined for Philip Morris cigarettes.  Just last month, the organization uncovered a series of injustices migrants from Central Asia countries faced while working in tobacco fields in Kazakhstan. Kazakh farm owners employ the migrants – mainly child labor. The farm owners in turn contract with and supply tobacco leaf to Philip Morris Kazakhstan, a subsidiary of Philip Morris International, one of the largest tobacco companies in the world. In many cases families were expected to pay back unrealistic debts to intermediaries who had arranged for their journeys to Kazakhstan, in schemes that bear all the hallmarks of people trafficking. All this, outlined in the report “Hellish Work” issued by HRW, which stressed, “Involvement of children in such work is a crime because they are exposed to large doses of nicotine, which is hazardous to health.” According to specialists, within one working day a child absorbs the nicotine in quantities equivalent to 36 smoked cigarettes; eventually they contract acute toxicity.

Electronic Cigarette "A Clean Alternative"

When Will We Wake Up?

Slave labor, deforestation, debt bondage, funding terror organizations…these factors aside from the dangers of smoking should lead to the end of such a surreptitious industry, yet year upon year, billions of dollars are generated from the sale of tobacco products.

The WHO estimates that tobacco causes about five million deaths per year and that smoking is the leading cause of preventable death in developed countries. If current smoking trends continue, they estimate that by the year 2030, more than eight million people will die yearly from tobacco-related causes, with one person dying every eight seconds from the 15 billion cigarettes sold every day.

Future predictions are by their nature speculative but some things are certain: the tobacco epidemic, with its attendant health and economic burden, is both increasing and also shifting from developed to developing nations. The industry is consolidating and also shifting from the west to developing regions, where there may be less government control and public debate about the role of transnational tobacco companies. The future looks austere; the global tobacco epidemic is worse today than it was 50 years ago, and it will be even worse in another 50 years unless an extraordinary effort is made now. Alas, even if banned, tobacco would find its way into the black market since there will always be people who smoke. Every day, more than 100, 000 people start smoking, with nearly of quarter of these having their first cigarette before the age of 10. When will this cycle ever end?

Read more posts from Lotus Layla @:

http://LotusLayla.wordpress.com

Post to Twitter

Green Nicotine Electronic Cigarette Contest

Monday, March 7th, 2011

Green Nicotine March Contest

***GreenNicotine User with the best video of GreenNicotine Wins TWO 100Pks =)***

Electronic Cigarette March Contest

Green Nicotine Videos must be submitted by 11:59PM March 31st, 2011

* All pictures/videos sent in will become property of Green Nicotine and sender understands Green Nicotine may use material in the future

Post to Twitter

Green Nicotine Founder’s Grandmother Dies

Monday, February 28th, 2011

Years ago, I lost my grandfather to lung cancer. A horrible death. A death attributed to years of traditional tobacco smoking. Like my grandfather, my grandmother smoked for years. Although it had been many years since her last smoke, the damage had already been done. Her lungs, heart, and system had already been broken beyond repair. Surgery after surgery just prolonged the inevitable. Today her fight to live ended.

As smokers, we never stop and realize what kind of damage we are doing to ourselves & those around us. We are so addicted, that we don’t ever stop and realize how long & painful a death associated with traditional tobacco really is.

It is a shame what Big Tobacco has gotten away with. How people like my grandparents where led to believe smoking was “cool” and harmless.

Controversy swirls around the electronic cigarette industry. Some lawmakers even attempt to ban these smoking alternatives. They say things like,”they (E-Cigarettes) could be dangerous,” or “they (E-Cigs) need to be FDA approved.”  Where the hell do these thoughts come from? Last I checked, it didn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out none of the chemicals, none of the known carcinogens, and none of the tar equals one hell of an alternative. Clearly, these lawmakers never went through the last 48 hours I did. They never had to care for a loved one on hospice too early from tobacco use. I certainly don’t wish this on them. But, if they want to fiddle with my industry, they better take a closer look at the implications.

Green Nicotine electronic cigarettes provide smokers with the look, taste, and feel of a cigarette without the tar, chemicals, and carcinogens associated with them. Yes…Green Nicotine E-Cigarettes save you money…but it’s not about the money!!! Green Nicotine allows you to “smoke” without building up tar in your lungs, without robbing your blood of oxygen, without exposing your children to 2nd & 3rd hand smoke, and without putting the thousands of chemicals in your system.  Lawmakers and Big Tobacco can tell you what ever they want to…those are the facts.

I have created the world’s highest quality electronic cigarette because of my personal life experiences. Big Tobacco is scared to death of my product. They should be! Every month Green Nicotine will get bigger, better, and more accepted. If Big Tobacco can not use their muscle to shut me down, within a decade I will turn their tobacco fields into corn fields. I have watched too many folks die from this stuff to just take it. I will make a difference in this world and put a dent in the death toll associated with traditional tobacco smoking.

Sean

GreenNicotine

President/CEO

Post to Twitter

Green Nicotine Contest

Thursday, February 17th, 2011

Contest Details*

Send a video, or picture, of you using Green Nicotine in public. I will evaluate videos/pictures myself. The person that sends in the winning Green Nicotine video/picture will receive:

- FREE Green Nicotine Electronic Cigarette Kit

- FREE Green Nicotine E Cig Carrying Case

- FREE Green Nicotine E Cigarette Car Charger

- FREE Green Nicotine 10pk Each Month for 12 Months

Send video/picture submissions to: Sean@GreenNicotine.com

Electronic Cigarette Contest

Be Creative!!!

* All pictures/videos sent in will become property of Green Nicotine and sender understands Green Nicotine may use material in the future

Post to Twitter

Electronic Cigarette Reviews, E Cigarette Reviews, E Cig Reviews

Saturday, February 5th, 2011

Electronic Cigarettes



E-Cigarettes are constantly up for review. Green Nicotine, NJoy, Green Smoke, and Smoke 51 are always in the lead in this industry. However, it is beginning to be very clear, when these E-Cigarettes are reviewed, one company always seems to out perform the competition: Green Nicotine. Green Nicotine’s batteries, cartridges, and customer service are unparralled in the electronic cigarette industry. E-cigarettes are a great concept, but are proving to be unreliable. Search these electronic cigarette companies on Google. You’ll find: Green Smoke has battery issues. Green Smoke has cartridge issues. Green Smoke has customer service issues. Some things you’ll find on Green Smoke…”They work great but the taste is not so good”…”having to charge batteries about 3 times per day.” Njoy cartridges work for a few good hits, then barely any vapor. NJoy is a 3 part system whos’ atomizers always go bad. Njoy’s cartridges are equivalent to about 10 cigs. Blu Cig has reviews almost identical to Njoy. This makes sense since both Njoy and Blu Cig are three part products, but why all the bad reviews on Green Smoke? Smoke 51 issues on reviews: “First battery just died suddenly after 3 weeks and would not take a charge”…”Smoke 51…replacement battery was impossible to draw through and was returned”…”SMOKE 51 has some serious quality control issues!”…”It is time to retire the SMOKE 51.”

Then you come to Green Nicotine reviews on Google. Look for bad reviews. Stay up 3 days trying to find one bad review online! You won’t, you can’t…what does that tell you e-cigarette users. Green Nicotine is the highest quality E-Cigarette in the World…period. Green Nicotine is spread all throughout the country. You mean to say with all these locations…not a single bad review on Green Nicotine. How is that possible? Higher quality components, higher quality fluids, superior customer service, better e-cigarette….Period. Search Google on Green Nicotine and come up with quotes like this…”It works wonderfully”…”Green Nicotine is an amazing product”…”Best electronic cigarette I’ve found”…”The flavor of Green Nicotine E-Cigs are so much better!!!”…”the Green Smoke was about  a pack of cigs, and Green Nicotine cartridges are over two packs!!!”…”My review of Green Nicotine…two thumbs way up!!!”…”Green Nicotine is exactly what they say they are…the best!” Great reviews all around for Green Nicotine.

Clearly, serious research and development has been done by the folks @ Green Nicotine. If your looking for an alternative to traditional tobacco cigarette, do not take my word for it. Search Google. See for yourself. Green Nicotine is the electronic cigarette hands down.

Post to Twitter

Secondhand Smoke Kills More Than 600,000 People Worldwide Every Year, According to a New Study

Sunday, December 12th, 2010

In the first look at the global impact of secondhand smoking, researchers analyzed data from 2004 for 192 countries. They found 40 percent of children and more than 30 percent of non-smoking men and women regularly breathe in secondhand smoke.

Scientists then estimated that  causes about 379,000 deaths from heart disease, 165,000 deaths from lower respiratory disease, 36,900 deaths from asthma and 21,400 deaths from lung cancer a year.

Altogether, those account for about 1 percent of the world’s deaths. The study was paid for by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare and Bloomberg Philanthropies. It was published Friday in the  Lancet.

“This helps us understand the real toll of tobacco,” said Armando Peruga, a program manager at the World Health Organization’s Tobacco-Free Initiative, who led the study. He said the approximately 603,000 deaths from secondhand smoking should be added to the 5.1 million deaths that smoking itself causes every year.

Peruga said WHO was particularly concerned about the 165,000 children who die of smoke-related respiratory infections, mostly in Southeast Asia and Africa.

“The mix of infectious diseases and secondhand smoke is a deadly combination,” Peruga said. Children whose parents smoke have a higher risk of , ear infections, pneumonia, bronchitis and asthma. Their lungs may also grow more slowly than kids whose parents don’t smoke.

Peruga and colleagues found the highest numbers of people exposed to secondhand smoke are in Europe and Asia. The lowest rates of exposure were in the Americas, the Eastern Mediterranean and Africa.

secondhand smoke had its biggest impact on women, killing about 281,000. In many parts of the world, women are at least 50 percent more likely to be exposed to  than men.

While many Western countries have introduced smoking bans in public places, experts said it would be difficult to legislate further.

“I don’t think it is likely we will see strong regulations reaching into homes,” said Heather Wipfli of the Institute for Global Health at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, who was not connected to the study. She said more public smoking bans and education might persuade people to quit smoking at home.

In the U.K., the British Lung Foundation is petitioning the government to outlaw smoking in cars.

Helena Shovelton, the foundation’s chief executive, said smoking parents frequently underestimate the danger their habit is doing to their children.

“It’s almost as if people are in denial,” she said. “They absolutely would not do something dangerous like leaving their child in the middle of the road but somehow, smoking in front of them is fine.”

GreenNicotineThe folks behind Green Nicotine electronic cigarettes hope to put a dent in the death toll associated with secondhand smoking. Green Nicotine offers traditional tobacco smokers an alternative to all the chemicals, carcinogens, and tar associated with traditional smoking. Green Nicotine e-cigarettes provide smokers with a product that looks, tastes, and feels like the real thing without exposing the nonsmoking public to 2nd & 3rd hand smoke. Green Nicotine E-Cigs have proven to be the new way to smoke…smoke free.

http://GreenNicotine.com/

Post to Twitter

Are You Afraid of Your Tobacco Cigarette…You Should Be!

Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010

The following is a list of the 81 carcinogens found in a traditional tobacco cigarettes:

Acetaldehyde Acetamide Acrylamide Acrylonitrile 2-Amino-3,4-dimethyl-3H-imidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (MeIQ) 3-Amino-1,4-dimethyl-5H-pyrido [4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-1) 2-Amino-l-methyl-6-phenyl-1H-imidazo [4,5-b]pyridine (PhlP) 2-Amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a:3',2'-d]imidazole (Glu-P-1) 3-Amino-l-methyl-5H-pyrido {4,3-b]indole (Trp-P-2 2-Amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (MeAaC) 2-Amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (AaC) 4-Aminobiphenyl 2-Aminodipyrido[1,2-a:3',2'-d]imidazole (Glu-P-2) 0-Anisidine Arsenic Benz[a]anthracene Benzene Benzo[a]pyrene Benzo[b]fluoranthene Benzo[j]fluoranthene Benzo[k]fluoranthene Benzo[b]furan Beryllium 1,3-Butadiene Cadmium Catechol (1,2-benzenediol) p-Chloroaniline Chloroform Cobalt p,p’-DDT Dibenz[a,h]acridine Dibenz[a,j]acridine Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 7H-Dibenzo[c,g]carbazole Dibenzo(a,e)pyrene Dibenzo(a,i)pyrene Dibenzo(a,h)pyrene Dibenzo(a,i)pyrene Dibenzo(a,l)pyrene 3,4-Dihydroxycinnamic acid (caffeic acid) Ethylbenzene Ethylene oxide Formaldehyde Furan Glycidol Heptachlor Hydrazine Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene IQ 92-Amino-3-methyl-3H-imidazo[4,5-f]quinoline) Isoprene Lead 5-Methyl-chrysene 2-Naphthylamine Nitrobenzene Nitrogen mustard Nitromethane 2-Nitropropane N-Nitrosodi-n-butylamine (NDBA) N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine (NDPA) N-Nitrosodiethanolamine (NDELA) N-Nitrosodiethylamine (DEN) N-Nitrosodimethylamine (DMN) N-Nitrosoethylmethylamine (NEMA, MEN) 4-(N-Nitrosomethylamino)-1-(3-pyridinyl)-1-butanone (NNK) N’-Nitrosonornicotine (NNN) N-Nitrosopiperidine (NPIP, NPP) N-Nitrosopyrrolidine (NPYR, NPY) Polonium-210 (Radon 222) Propylene oxide Safrole Styrene Tetrachloroethylene o-Toluidine (2-methylaniline) Trichloroethylene Urethane (carbamic acid, ethyl ester) Vinyl acetate Vinyl chloride 4-Vinylcyclohexene 2,6-Xylidine (2,6-dimethylaniline)

If these $25 dollar words don’t make you nervous…go ahead…have another one…

Green Nicotine Electronic Cigarette Traditional Cig

Here’s a little something to look forward to: On the left: A good lung. On the right: Your lungs if you don’t stop smoking these things!!!

Green Nicotine Electronic Cigarette healthy lung diseased lung cancer

Are you ready to make a decision???

Post to Twitter

Cigarette Tax Increased to Keep New York Running

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

Green Nicotine Electronic Cigarette Smokefree Budget Interview

ALBANY — New Yorkers who like to smoke will have to dig a little deeper to light up next month, after the Legislature passed a bill on Monday that will give the state the highest cigarette taxes in the country.

NYC: Taxes for Your Health.

Nathaniel Brooks for The New York Times:

Kevin S. Parker of Brooklyn and the other 31 Democrats in the State Senate all voted to increase the tax by $1.60 a pack.
The new law, part of an emergency budget measure to keep the government running, adds another $1.60 in state taxes to every cigarette pack sold starting on July 1, pushing the average price of a pack to about $9.20.

The average price in New York City, which imposes its own cigarette taxes, will be even higher, nearly $11 a pack.

Those who prefer other tobacco products will also be forced to pay significantly more.

The tax on smokeless tobacco will more than double, to $2 an ounce from 96 cents an ounce, starting on Aug. 1. And the wholesale tax on cigars, dips and other kinds of tobacco will rise to 75 percent from 46 percent .

And in what may be the legislation’s most controversial provisions, starting on Sept. 1, the state will begin collecting — or try to collect — taxes on cigarettes sold on Indian reservations to off-reservation visitors, an issue that led to violent protests during the early 1990s.

One Indian chief has said that trying to collect taxes would be considered an act of war…

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/22/nyregion/22budget.html

Post to Twitter

Hypocrisy on “Light” and “Ultralight” Cigarettes

Friday, June 18th, 2010

“In anticipation of a ban against using words such as “light” or “mild” on cigarette labels and ads, tobacco companies have lightened package colors to convey the same message, a move the American Lung Association and Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., have attacked as disingenuous.”

and

“As for the color changes, “this is a transparent attempt by the tobacco industry to evade the law and mislead consumers,” Waxman said Friday.”

and

“”The tobacco industry is masterful in its knowledge of consumer behavior and marketing,” says Paul Billings, vice president for national policy at the lung association.”

-USA Today, 6/14/10

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2010-06-14-lightcigarettes14_ST_N.htm

“We are concerned that the disclaimers in your onsert would likewise be ineffective in mitigating any potential mistaken beliefs that may be perpetuated by your onsert.”

-Lawrence Deyton, FDA, 6/17/10

http://www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/ucm216154.htm

“By stating that only the packaging is changing, but the cigarettes will stay the same, the onsert suggests that Marlboro in the gold pack will have the same characteristics as Marlboro Lights, including any mistaken attributes associated with the “light” cigarettes.”"

-Matt Myers, CTFK, 6/17/10

http://tobaccofreekids.org/Script/DisplayPressRelease.php3?Display=1215

“Sound product regulations protect consumers from health frauds. But S.2461 perpetuates the deadliest consumer fraud (safer cigarettes) by allowing ‘light’ cigarettes to remain on the market in their easily recognized pack designs and colors (minus the word ‘light’). Marlboro Lights largest market share would increase (at expense of competitor brands) while current customers continue smoking the brand, which Philip Morris would call Marlboro Gold. Yet, S.2461 does nothing to warn smokers that ‘lights’ are just as hazardous as other cigarettes.”

-Smokefree Pennsylvania 9/20/04 letter to US Congress

http://www.smokefree.net/bg-announce/messages/247151.html

“Although S. 625 eliminates cigarette brand descriptors “Light”, “Low-Tar” and “Mild,” (which arguably is the deadliest consumer fraud of the 20th century), consumers of these products would barely notice this change because these brands would remain on the market in their easily recognized package designs and colors (minus one word). Marlboro Lights, which has the largest market share of any cigarette, would simply become known as Marlboro Gold, while Marlboro Ultralights would simply become known as Marlboro Ultras or Marlboro Silver. Meanwhile, S. 625 does nothing to warn smokers that the brands previously named “Lights” and “Ultralights” are just as hazardous as other cigarettes.”

-Smokefree Pennsylvania 2/27/07 testimony to US Senate HELP Committee

http://www.smokefree.net/bg-announce/messages/247583.html

“While H.R. 1108 properly bans deceptive “low-tar”, “light” and “mild” brand descriptors for cigarettes, the bill simultaneously perpetuates this deadly consumer health myth/fraud (also incorrectly believed by 85% of smokers) that some cigarettes are safer than others by failing to warn smokers that all cigarettes are equally hazardous, and by authorizing and paving the way for the FDA to establish deceptive cigarette emission standards based upon inaccurate cigarette machine tests (which is what created the low-tar/lights safer cigarette myth/fraud decades ago under FTC oversight).”
and
“To more adequately inform consumers about the vastly different risks of different tobacco products, Smokefree Pennsylvania urges you to SUPPORT an amendment to HR 1108 requiring the FDA to assess and make publicly available a ranking of different tobacco and nicotine-containing products based upon their health risks.”

Smokefree Pennsylvania 3/3/08 letter to US House Health Subcommittee

http://www.smokefree.net/bg-announce/messages/247915.html

Smokefree Pennsylvania 4/1/08 letter to US House Energy and Commerce Committee

http://www.smokefree.net/bg-announce/messages/247929.html

Smokefree Pennsylvania 7/28/08 letter to US House of Representatives

http://www.smokefree.net/bg-announce/messages/248038.html

Post to Twitter