Archive for the ‘Blu Cig Review’ Category

Cigarette Tax Increased to Keep New York Running

Tuesday, June 22nd, 2010

Green Nicotine Electronic Cigarette Smokefree Budget Interview

ALBANY — New Yorkers who like to smoke will have to dig a little deeper to light up next month, after the Legislature passed a bill on Monday that will give the state the highest cigarette taxes in the country.

NYC: Taxes for Your Health.

Nathaniel Brooks for The New York Times:

Kevin S. Parker of Brooklyn and the other 31 Democrats in the State Senate all voted to increase the tax by $1.60 a pack.
The new law, part of an emergency budget measure to keep the government running, adds another $1.60 in state taxes to every cigarette pack sold starting on July 1, pushing the average price of a pack to about $9.20.

The average price in New York City, which imposes its own cigarette taxes, will be even higher, nearly $11 a pack.

Those who prefer other tobacco products will also be forced to pay significantly more.

The tax on smokeless tobacco will more than double, to $2 an ounce from 96 cents an ounce, starting on Aug. 1. And the wholesale tax on cigars, dips and other kinds of tobacco will rise to 75 percent from 46 percent .

And in what may be the legislation’s most controversial provisions, starting on Sept. 1, the state will begin collecting — or try to collect — taxes on cigarettes sold on Indian reservations to off-reservation visitors, an issue that led to violent protests during the early 1990s.

One Indian chief has said that trying to collect taxes would be considered an act of war…

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/22/nyregion/22budget.html

Post to Twitter

Hypocrisy on “Light” and “Ultralight” Cigarettes

Friday, June 18th, 2010

“In anticipation of a ban against using words such as “light” or “mild” on cigarette labels and ads, tobacco companies have lightened package colors to convey the same message, a move the American Lung Association and Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., have attacked as disingenuous.”

and

“As for the color changes, “this is a transparent attempt by the tobacco industry to evade the law and mislead consumers,” Waxman said Friday.”

and

“”The tobacco industry is masterful in its knowledge of consumer behavior and marketing,” says Paul Billings, vice president for national policy at the lung association.”

-USA Today, 6/14/10

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2010-06-14-lightcigarettes14_ST_N.htm

“We are concerned that the disclaimers in your onsert would likewise be ineffective in mitigating any potential mistaken beliefs that may be perpetuated by your onsert.”

-Lawrence Deyton, FDA, 6/17/10

http://www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/ucm216154.htm

“By stating that only the packaging is changing, but the cigarettes will stay the same, the onsert suggests that Marlboro in the gold pack will have the same characteristics as Marlboro Lights, including any mistaken attributes associated with the “light” cigarettes.”"

-Matt Myers, CTFK, 6/17/10

http://tobaccofreekids.org/Script/DisplayPressRelease.php3?Display=1215

“Sound product regulations protect consumers from health frauds. But S.2461 perpetuates the deadliest consumer fraud (safer cigarettes) by allowing ‘light’ cigarettes to remain on the market in their easily recognized pack designs and colors (minus the word ‘light’). Marlboro Lights largest market share would increase (at expense of competitor brands) while current customers continue smoking the brand, which Philip Morris would call Marlboro Gold. Yet, S.2461 does nothing to warn smokers that ‘lights’ are just as hazardous as other cigarettes.”

-Smokefree Pennsylvania 9/20/04 letter to US Congress

http://www.smokefree.net/bg-announce/messages/247151.html

“Although S. 625 eliminates cigarette brand descriptors “Light”, “Low-Tar” and “Mild,” (which arguably is the deadliest consumer fraud of the 20th century), consumers of these products would barely notice this change because these brands would remain on the market in their easily recognized package designs and colors (minus one word). Marlboro Lights, which has the largest market share of any cigarette, would simply become known as Marlboro Gold, while Marlboro Ultralights would simply become known as Marlboro Ultras or Marlboro Silver. Meanwhile, S. 625 does nothing to warn smokers that the brands previously named “Lights” and “Ultralights” are just as hazardous as other cigarettes.”

-Smokefree Pennsylvania 2/27/07 testimony to US Senate HELP Committee

http://www.smokefree.net/bg-announce/messages/247583.html

“While H.R. 1108 properly bans deceptive “low-tar”, “light” and “mild” brand descriptors for cigarettes, the bill simultaneously perpetuates this deadly consumer health myth/fraud (also incorrectly believed by 85% of smokers) that some cigarettes are safer than others by failing to warn smokers that all cigarettes are equally hazardous, and by authorizing and paving the way for the FDA to establish deceptive cigarette emission standards based upon inaccurate cigarette machine tests (which is what created the low-tar/lights safer cigarette myth/fraud decades ago under FTC oversight).”
and
“To more adequately inform consumers about the vastly different risks of different tobacco products, Smokefree Pennsylvania urges you to SUPPORT an amendment to HR 1108 requiring the FDA to assess and make publicly available a ranking of different tobacco and nicotine-containing products based upon their health risks.”

Smokefree Pennsylvania 3/3/08 letter to US House Health Subcommittee

http://www.smokefree.net/bg-announce/messages/247915.html

Smokefree Pennsylvania 4/1/08 letter to US House Energy and Commerce Committee

http://www.smokefree.net/bg-announce/messages/247929.html

Smokefree Pennsylvania 7/28/08 letter to US House of Representatives

http://www.smokefree.net/bg-announce/messages/248038.html

Post to Twitter

Nicotine fit: Wife jumps from moving vehicle because husband won’t stop for smokes, police say

Thursday, June 17th, 2010

COE TWP. — A Shepherd woman is being treated for head trauma at Blodgett Hospital in Grand Rapids after leaping from a pickup because her husband refused to stop for her to purchase cigarettes about 7:30 p.m. Sunday, Isabella County sheriff’s officials said.

Jacklin L. Faber, 51, was the passenger in a GMC Sierra pickup driven by Michael E. Faber, 54, of Shepherd, and according to sheriff’s officials, when Michael Faber refused to stop for his wife to purchase cigarettes, Jacklin Faber “decided to jump out of the pickup while it was traveling down the road” on South Shepherd Road, south of Federal in Coe Township.

Sheriff’s officials said Michael Faber realized his wife’s intentions just before she jumped and was able to slow the vehicle to between 10 mph and 15 mph before she leapt.

Jacklin Faber suffered head injuries and was transported to Central Michigan Community Hospital and later airlifted by helicopter to Blodgett Hospital in Grand Rapids for treatment.

Jacklin Faber was listed in critical condition at Blodgett Hospital in Grand Rapids as of 2 p.m. Monday.

Green

http://www.mlive.com/news/saginaw/index.ssf/2010/05/nicotine_fit_woman_jumps_from.html

Post to Twitter

Electronic Cigarette and Utah

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

Green Nicotine Electronic Cigarette Kiosk Utah Layton Hills Mall

GreenNicotine's Layton Hills Mall location in Utah

Green Nicotine Electronic Cigarette Utah Layton Mills Mall

GreenNicotine has just added another electronic cigarette location in Utah @ the Layton Hills Mall. In addition, to our Salt Lake locations this will offer up convenience for our customers. Shortly, no matter where you go in Salt Lake you will be able to find your GreenNicotine refills. Currently, we are in talks with a number of establishments, and convenience stores, there to carry GreenNicotine. GreenNicotine is quickly becoming the new way to smoke…smoke free in Utah.

Post to Twitter